Comments on: Why Sunday’s RAGM is a big moment for Canadian Theatre and why it’s got nothing to do with raising dues

By: The Indie Caucus goes to Videofag » Praxis Theatre

Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:42:08 +0000

[…] in Toronto. However, for the last few years, the Caucus has been focused primarily on tackling the major issues we face together in relation to Canadian Actors’ Equity […]

]]>

By: What the new Indie should look like » Praxis Theatre

Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:01:50 +0000

[…] been at odds when it came to how independent theatre ought to be made in this country. These two articles offer quite a bit of history on this issue, including the votes by members to demand a new […]

]]>

By: Who to vote for in the CAEA elections » Praxis Theatre

Mon, 08 Oct 2012 14:42:51 +0000

[…] and endorsing an indie slate with these collective intentions. We have written extensively about Equity’s long and drawn-out process to create a new Indie Agreement, and my Praxis colleague Michael Wheeler […]

]]>

By: An open letter to some of the old farts » Praxis Theatre

Fri, 20 Jul 2012 16:10:41 +0000

[…] one of the biggest roadblocks to the development of their work, another issue we’ve written about extensively. You’ll find no apathy on this topic. Younger artists have been working together for years to […]

]]>

By: Equity Member? This is where you should be on Monday night – Praxis Theatre

Fri, 24 Feb 2012 19:33:32 +0000

[…] Last November we wrote about a Canadian Actors’ Equity Association Meeting and why, as independent theatre artists, it was important for you to attend. […]

]]>

By: Philip Akin

Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:59:32 +0000

Ok Mark I get that and it does seem prudent but I have to say that if expected cuts come on the producer’s side because of government cutbacks etc then production will go down and I suspect many more actors will be going on withdrawal and this dues increase won’t be able to make up for that. A proposal on the table right now with the Canada Council will take 1% away from operating budgets and another 10% to be taken for re-allocation. Couple that with potential TAC cuts and we will all be cutting core programs. And if producer’s cut then the whole structural side of the industry will have to cut.

]]>

By: Mark Brownell

Sun, 27 Nov 2011 15:42:37 +0000

Well you are probably still buzzing from the Prince concert so it is entirely understandable.

A caveat: I am not an accountant, but here’s the way I understand it…

Last year’s financial statement found on the website in the “news” subdirectory indicates there was no deficit. The accumulated surplus that you refer to is intact. But it’s become apparent that the yearly operating budget will be heading into deficit this year. As you probably know, rainy day stabilization funds have a tendency to disappear very quickly when there is a structural deficit occuring. Equity is not-for-profit – so things need to balance out to zero. That is becoming increasingly difficult as inflation takes its bite, working dues drop, and more and more members default on their basic dues. The new numbers will be presented at the NAGM in February 2012 in Toronto. Equity has already started to downsize its programs and is taking a very hard look at cutting some core functions should the referendum go down to defeat.

]]>

By: Philip Akin

Tue, 22 Nov 2011 01:42:41 +0000

Sigh…and the spellcheck would reply: Gee Philip, their = there

]]>

By: Philip Akin

Tue, 22 Nov 2011 01:40:06 +0000

Hi Mark,

Is their a deficit for the last year end? I haven’t seen any numbers around that but even so it does not address the Cash Assets of over 2 Mil.
All I am saying is that if the rational for an increase is budgetary then there should be something that shows that.

Philip

]]>

By: Mark Brownell

Mon, 21 Nov 2011 20:00:22 +0000

Hi Philip,

I believe Kris is referring to the current yearly budget – not an accumulated deficit.

]]>