Comments on: Performance ethnography – seeking the invisible
https://praxistheatre.com/2013/05/performance-ethnography-seeking-the-invisible/
Wed, 30 Aug 2017 17:16:02 +0000hourly1https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.1By: Kallee
https://praxistheatre.com/2013/05/performance-ethnography-seeking-the-invisible/comment-page-1/#comment-18077
Wed, 15 May 2013 00:49:58 +0000https://praxistheatre.com/?p=12359#comment-18077Hey Wiktor!
Great point. I think in the humanities scholars get stuck between a rock and a hard place (as we Theatre Studies folks know all too well) in that we’d love to adopt concrete methodologies from other disciplines, but those disciplines want nothing to do with anything that doesn’t fit inside their model. I guess we’re left creating our own methodologies and waiting for everyone else to realize we were right all along 😉
]]>By: Wiktor Kulinski
https://praxistheatre.com/2013/05/performance-ethnography-seeking-the-invisible/comment-page-1/#comment-18053
Tue, 14 May 2013 06:42:18 +0000https://praxistheatre.com/?p=12359#comment-18053Largely unaccounted, definitely; and frequently encountered. The humanities are incubators for exploring the significance of such subjective accounts but something strikes me about the fluctuating way we present them. When should we decide what viewpoint — be it anthropology, psychology, etc — to take? Irving’s account is detailed and fascinating, but does his decision to negate concrete methodological frameworks weaken his position?
]]>