Comments on: #FactoryTheatreOpenings https://praxistheatre.com/2014/10/factorytheatreopenings/ Wed, 30 Aug 2017 17:16:02 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.1 By: Celeste Sansregret https://praxistheatre.com/2014/10/factorytheatreopenings/comment-page-1/#comment-31738 Thu, 23 Oct 2014 19:42:10 +0000 https://praxistheatre.com/?p=14252#comment-31738 Carrie is right. The theatre is a business, and like any business, has the absolute right to invite the media any old night it likes. Fair enough. Obliging the media to pay for a seat if they want to come early in the run: fair enough.

As a producer though, if I think the show is ready, and it is good, I want to be reviewed as early on as possible, because good press helps me sell tickets. This is the part of the Factory’s decision that I don’t understand.

It’s the business decision aspect of this that makes no sense to me.

Aislinn, you have over 200 seats a night to sell, and you’re co-producing. I assume this means making money is of some importance to you.

I get wanting to make those mainstream reviews count for less at the box office. I also get that younger people go to other sources for information.

I’m just not sure audience comments on twitter and reviewproject.org are going to put bums in seats the way you need, to sell over 200 seats a night in a highly competitive, and over-crowded market.

I’d be very interested to hear how this works out for you. Merde.

]]>
By: Carrie Sager https://praxistheatre.com/2014/10/factorytheatreopenings/comment-page-1/#comment-31205 Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:12:21 +0000 https://praxistheatre.com/?p=14252#comment-31205 This is an interesting conversation, but what I find consistently bewildering is the constant referral to exclusion. Factory is not excluding anyone, they are simply deciding who to give complimentary tickets to and when. Every other business in the world has the right to decide how to run their business and with whom to do business. Even art is a business.

I would like to respond to Aislinn’s comment “we might have communicated it differently to the press.” When the media come to us and say “We are thinking of not reviewing any shows at SummerWorks this year, is that okay with you?” or “We are cutting all our space for preview or feature stories in order to focus solely on Hollywood and celebrity gossip items, but if that doesn’t work we will cover you again,” then perhaps we can also include them in the decisions we are making about our work.

I have been working with the theatre media in Toronto and Canada for over 20 years and their first, and often only, priority is to sell newspapers, etc. That is their business. But still, I have spent the last two decades trying to find ways for theatre artists and the media to play nice together. And, I 100% support this Factory decision.

In response to Michael’s “surprisingly vehement response to Factory’s decision,” the vehemence has come 99% from media – legit or otherwise. Not theatrelovers.

I really appreciate Martin’s comments below, and rest assured we will be providing all audience members who attend Factory shows a variety of ways to provide feedback, both publicly and anonymously, in order to facilitate the conversation this decision was intended to generate. A conversation between people who choose to go to the theatre because they want the kind of experiences in their life that only live theatre can offer.

Members of the media who wish to attend BUNKER’s media night on October 21, or any following performance, are more than welcome.

]]>
By: Martin Morrow https://praxistheatre.com/2014/10/factorytheatreopenings/comment-page-1/#comment-31142 Thu, 09 Oct 2014 17:26:49 +0000 https://praxistheatre.com/?p=14252#comment-31142 Your talk about ways to solicit feedback reminded me that Alberta Theatre Projects, during its (now, alas, defunct) playRites festival, used to supply feedback forms at each performance. Then the notes they collected were posted on cardboard pillars in the lobby of the theatre — one pillar for each of the four new plays premiering at the festival. The notes were anonymous and of course, even in the pre-internet days, there were trolls who just talked trash about the show. But there would also be quite a few thoughtful comments and, read as a whole, one got a pretty clear picture of how a show had gone down with audiences. I used to read them faithfully — after I’d written my reviews — to see to whether or not other people shared my impressions.

]]>
By: Michael Healey https://praxistheatre.com/2014/10/factorytheatreopenings/comment-page-1/#comment-31097 Wed, 08 Oct 2014 13:28:16 +0000 https://praxistheatre.com/?p=14252#comment-31097 This is a great discussion on a bewildering subject. A comment, and a couple of questions: first, I think Kelly N does a better job than most of realizing the contradictory nature of being of the community and separate from it. Do you think, given the surprisingly vehement response to Factory’s decision, that there’s a higher degree of sensitivity among theatrelovers these days? Because this doesn’t strike me as a legit controversy. If yes, then why? What is causing this — it can’t just be the internet’s fault. I have a theory that I’m going to flesh out some day when I have 10 quiet minutes.

The other question is specifically for Aislinn: given Factory’s recent history, if you’d known this move would generate the kind of pushback that would force you to occasionally walk away from your desk, would you have made the move?

]]>