August 25, 2010, by
12 comments

Why Stephen Harper Will Continue to Attack the Arts

Someone forgot to tell the PM that encouraging Nickeback actually reduces Canadian culture...or did they?

Someone forgot to tell the PM that encouraging Nickelback actually reduces Canadian culture...or did they?

by Michael Wheeler

Shortly after the 2008 Federal election, Peter Donolo, soon-to-be Chief of Staff to Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff, addressed a select group of executive directors and organizational leaders at an industry seminar organized by The Arts Advocate. In his role as pollster for The Globe and Mail during the election, Donolo had accumulated extensive data on the arts and how it had impacted the race. One piece of information from his presentation produced audible exhalations and dismayed nodding of heads:

The highest polling numbers the Harper campaign ever saw in the province of Ontario were on the day after his Ordinary People Don’t Care About The Arts statement (Sept 24/08).

However much it seems retrospectively the comments were a careless slip that may have cost the government a majority, the reality is there was an emotional resonance to this message that initially gave him momentum in a battleground province. Eventually, these numbers receded in the weeks before voters went to the polls, leaving the merged Canadian Alliance and PC parties short of a majority government with the support of just over one third of the electorate.

Seen in this context, comments made by the PM to the national media that he was “concerned” by Catherine Frid’s play Homegrown at the 2010 Summerworks Festival begin to fit into the government’s larger agenda as a strategic exercise by a government no longer able to communicate through rational discourse.  These comments point to a desire to use emotionally charged signposts to frame discussions and talking points, rather than the merits of programs and policies based on data or logic.

Will we talk about the arts next election in relation to harnessing our imaginations and creativity within a complex and multidimensional culture? Or will we discuss the arts in relation to whether we should use tax dollars to support terrorism? These are the types of paradigms that are being established in the discourse leading up to the next election.

If Harper succeeds in connecting arts funding and supporting terrorism, it will fit in well with a campaign that paints public funding for political parties to replace the influence of massive donations by corporations and unions as supporting separatism, a coalition government as advocating socialism, and an inquiry into the largest series of civil rights violations in Canadian history at G20 as supporting anarchism.

Of course none of these references are true, but it doesn’t matter. Every mainstream reviewer who saw Homegrown went out of their way to specifically address the allegations by the PM and his office that the play “glorified terrorism”. Each one reached the identical explicit conclusion that the play in no way justified or supported terrorism. What matters is that arts funding and taking a “sympathetic” view of terrorism are now a cultural meme that some people will remember. Mission accomplished.

This type of highly emotional and dramatic hyperbole will be backed up by an impressive war chest accumulated by the Conservative Party that has been significantly out-fundraising the opposition since fall 2008. In the lead up to the next election, this will back a multi-million dollar wave of negative ads in every media geared at emotional flashpoints in an effort to define complex policy issues with simple narratives that elicit a kneejerk response from sub-cortical “reptilian” elements of the brain.

By hoping to communicate with voters through fight or flight stimuli, the goal is to avoid any rational or substantive debate. Next year, without any reliable or detailed information available through the census, there will be even less data available to evaluate and discuss policies and programs. The heavily partisan bent of the Harper government has forced it to abdicate a knowledge-based discussion of their policies, save a few economic statistics that neglect to mention the sizeable budget surplus Canada had when they took the reins of government and the huge deficit they have generated five years later.

When Kory Teneycke (l) was Communications Director fo the PM they lunched with Fox News President Rupert Murdoch. Four months later he left his position to lead Quebecor Media's attempt to rewrite CRTC rules to start a "Fox News North".

When Kory Teneycke (l) was Communications Director to the PM they both lunched in NYC with Fox News President Rupert Murdoch. Four months later he left his position to lead Quebecor Media's attempt to rewrite CRTC rules in their favour to start Fox News North, which he is pictured announcing.

This embrace by Conservative strategists of US Tea Party-style political tactics is set to be joined by the biggest weapon in regressive populist media: Our very own Fox News. Upset that the current CRTC head won’t fast track a special Category 1 licence for a national TV station to be run by Harper’s previous spokesperson, Harper is set to replace him with someone who is willing to break CRTC rules to allow him a national TV station dedicated to supporting and propagating his ideology.

Who owns the station “applying” for this licence? You guessed it: SUN Media. The very same SUN Media that created the Homegrown controversy in their Toronto newspaper and scandalously asked Harper about the play with one of only two English language questions available to the media in Harper’s first comments to the country in over a month. It has since been revealed that virtually every other journalist in attendance had already agreed to ask him about the census. (What the entire national media didn’t think Canadians from coast-to-coast were dying to hear the PMs thoughts on a summer indie theatre festival?)

There is an unfortunate logic to politics that right-wing parties are succeeding when they are talking about the military and the economy, and failing when they talk about things like education, healthcare and culture. By framing culture as a “spending” and  “national security” issue they are effectively taking a topic that is a loser for them and turning it into a winner. Combine that with the strong numbers in Ontario after Harper’s anti-arts statements in 2008 and the fact the Conservatives have given up completely in Quebec, and we may be looking at another election where arts and culture is again under attack.

This is not necessarily a great strategy for Harper – where last election arts and culture supporters were caught off guard being attacked by their own government, this election they will be organized, have lists of active supporters in every major city, and have identified leaders and organizing strategies that target swing ridings. They are also way better than them at gaining earned media and using the internet. At the end of the day, it will be up to the opposition, the non-Quebecor owned press, and civil society to shift the debate out of the highly emotional, into factual analysis of the policies and parties that will best serve the country.

Lately, it has been the subject of some media as to whether an emotional, ideologically-based discussion of policies and programs can become a substitute for rational debate that includes data and information.

It can not.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

12 comments:

  1. Megan Mooney says:

    Michael, thank you. I always enjoy reading your thoughts, and this is no exception. I mean, maybe ‘enjoy’ is the wrong description, perhaps ‘scares the shit out of me’ is more appropriate, you get the idea.

    I’ll be honest, when the ‘homegrown’ controversy first hit in the Sun my reaction was “oh… The Sun” in a wistful, and admittedly condescending kind of way. I was in grant-writing hell, and didn’t really give it a lot more thought.

    I spoke with Frid long before any of the controversy about her piece came to light. We were talking in context of publicity, different approaches and how to frame things as a first-time playwright and so on. She’s a lawyer, and this was one of her first plays. It was based on her experiences, her visits, her conversations. It sounded interesting, and it didn’t occur to me that it would be controversial. Turns out getting publicity wasn’t an issue for the piece.

    Unfortunately I was sick as a dog through all of Summerworks and wasn’t able to see anything, but I certainly wasn’t surprised when I read the reviews saying it was not promoting terrorism at all in anyway.

    I’m glad you took the time to point out this other angle, forest for the trees and all that.

  2. Michael says:

    Thanks for your kind words Megan.

    Obviously this is a scary situation. Fortunately the Harper gov’t is only representative of a fraction of Canadians and their appeal is shrinking. Brian Topp pointed out in the Globe and Mail this week that if you compare their #s to the combined results of the Canadian Alliance and PC parties before the merger, less people are actually identified as Conservative since Harper took over. If the opposition is able to put the needs of the country ahead of internal party politics, there is an extraordinary opportunity get rid of these guys. If you explain what is going on here to any non-Canadian with a knowledge of the Parliamentary system, they’re just like, “Why doesn’t the opposition get together and stop this from happening?”

    I think civil society has to put a lot more pressure on the parties to stop putting their needs ahead of the country with an emphasis on the right-leaning folks that surround Ignatieff who would rather lose an election than share power with anyone else.

  3. Michael says:

    I also wanted to thank the Facebook group Can This Onion Ring Get More Fans Than Stephen Harper for posting a link to this post today. Traffic went through the roof and you can read an additional 63 comments to this post on the page.
    For the record:
    Onion Ring: 166,989 fans
    Stephen Harper: 34,848 fans

  4. Very good journalism for an “arts” guy. Kudos for taking on a subject the Canadian press neither has the patience or chops for. It takes eyes and ears on the street to challenge the dark Harper narrative. Only by the grace of the Muses that Harper hasn’t done better with his narrative, so it will take constant viligent ad hoc writers to take on the challenge and not rely on traditional lamestream media for the other side of the story to be told.

  5. Michael says:

    Thanks Michael, I agree.
    I’m not in Toronto right now, but someone just sent me a note that this article, that refers to artists as “communists, socialists and blatant waste-a-holics” is the cover story today’s The Toronto Sun. The online comments to this particular article are cracking me up: Someone is making some very good points under the username “artist” and the usual riff raff are having a hard time keeping up intellectually so they are resorting TO RESPONDING IN CAPS LOCK!

  6. Michael says:

    This is a fairly comprehensive piece about the status of Sun TV’s application with the CRTC.

    I’m no media insider, but learning from this article that CBC and CTV will soon downgrade to Category 2 licenses and that this new application is now also for a Category 2 license leads me to believe that Sun TVs rrejected Category 1 application was just a lark to make people okay with Fox News North getting special treatment to get “just” a Category 2 station up and running in time for a spring 2011 election.

    It’s also worth noting that since this post was published, the issue has attracted much more attention in the media (well, the Globe and Mail anyhow) after Avaaz began promoting a high profile petition (which I have signed), and and Canadian literary paragon Margaret Atwood has publicly declared her support for. Kory Tenyeke (pictured above) responded predictably that her concerns lacked merit as Separatist who had advocated for strategic voting in the past election (she said if she lived in Quebec she would have voted Bloc over voting for Harper), and that the petition was illegitimate due to funding by American Billionaaire George Soros.

    In short, “Margaret Atwood is both a quebecois separatist and an Americanist who does not believe in free speech”. I think this is a pretty good example of how they will continue to dodge factual analysis of what they’re up to by changing the channel to emotionally charged signposts regardless of their relevance.

  7. [...] Best Blog Post: – Sync – Sync – Arcade Fire and the Maturation of Digital Media — Thoughts on Creativity – The Equivocator: The Politicization of Canadian News – XOXO Jes – The Queer Behind the Mirror – The Gormley Files – Robyn Urback – Transmopolis – Wild Reports (1) – Transmopolis – Wild Reports (2) – Calgary Grit – Pundits’ Guide – Praxis Theatre [...]

  8. [...] You can read more about the Canadian Blog Awards and the other categories here, and refresh your memory on our popular piece “Why Stephen Harper Will Continue to Attack the Arts”, which has been nominated for Best Blog Post here. [...]

  9. Anonymous says:

    stephan horpor is a waste of polictcal space;)…

  10. Google says:

    In fact when someone doesn’t be aware of then its up to other visitors that they will help, so
    here it occurs.

    Feel free to surf to my blog: Google